McGEER v MACINTOSH: PAVING A SAFER WAY FOR CYCLISTS?

Read on for Charles Feeny’s explanation on the case of McGeer v Macintosh in his latest note, “Paving a Safer Way for Cyclists?” on our Pro-VIDE site. This case involved a cyclist who undertook a stationary car at traffic lights and then cycled to the nearside of an HGV which was indicating to turn left. Mr. Feeny acted as the Claimant’s counsel on this case. You can also download an official copy of the final judgment on McGeer here.

Charles Feeny is recognised by Chambers & Partners as ‘working at the forefront of technological changes for the legal services with our digital business – Complete Counsel.’

Charles Feeny is recognised by Chambers & Partners as ‘working at the forefront of technological changes for the legal services with our digital business – Complete Counsel.’

Charles is also recognised for his superb advocacy skills and the ability to always be relied upon to provide the right answer in complex and high value cases together with an ‘innovative approach’ to clin neg litigation.

Court of Appeal Judgment on Reaney v University Hospital of North Staffordshire Trust and Another

The Court of Appeal have today handed down Judgment on the case of Reaney v University Hospital of North Staffordshire Trust and Another. Read on for Charles Feeny’s explanation of the Judgment here.